Arguments Made in Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry Essay

Arguments Made In Take The Tortillas Out Of Your Poetry Even though the cultural and veiled censorships have to do with why they wont let his book be read, he talks about why he wrote the novel, that it was a reflection of his childhood, and that censors only paid attention to one detail and that was the so-called bad words in Spanish and they used that as an excuse because the novel did not meet the criteria of the circumstances. The censors used a technique where they zoomed in on one detail of the novel and made it seem that because it was in Spanish, it had profanity in it. Rudolfo Anaya made a great point when he said that if we leave the tortillas out of our poetry meaning cultural values, then the cultural were portraying will go†¦show more content†¦He goes on to say had they read the novel, they would have discovered that it is not about profanity. In his exact words he says, â€Å"the novel was a reflection of my childhood, a view into the Nuevo Mexicano culture of a small town. I looked at values, I looked at folkways , I created heroic characters out of poor farmers. I wrote about old healing remedies used by the folk to cure physiological illness. I elevated what I found in my childhood, because that is the way I had experienced my childhood.† (Anaya 71). He goes on to say that he believes that the reason why schools burned his books was because they did not want a reflection of his way of life in school. The country was not yet involved with cultural diversity. Chicanos were very upset and disappointed about this because they believed they had a right to literature in their books. That is why the 1990 attack on the NEA by fundamentalist censors has created a national rage and discussion. People have spoken out on their right of freedom of expression and that even though they tried to get others to see their point of view on this, they had to deal with these vicious attacks on their freedom and their storytelling. I think he makes a good point when he is trying to make readers understand that he wrote this novel for

U.s. Intervention Abroad During The Vietnam War - 1172 Words

From Vietnam to Iran: U.S. Intervention Abroad From Vietnam to Iraq, the United States has intervened in dozens of countries, claiming each instance as a fight for democracy and liberation. While that claim is embraced by some Americans, others reject it. Since the 1900s, a growing number of Americans have questioned U.S. international motives and oppose U.S. intervention abroad. These Americans believe that intervention results in pointless bloodshed without liberation. Movies can act as a medium to represent the full spectrum of American attitudes towards U.S. intervention abroad. Full Metal Jacket (1979) follows the journey of a Marine recruit during the Vietnam War, and Argo (2012) recounts the CIA rescue of six American hostages†¦show more content†¦involvement. Through Joker’s interactions with other U.S. soldiers, the film explores multiple opinions on the Vietnam War, focusing mostly on the critics of U.S. intervention. The Vietnam scene opens up with an interaction between Private Joker and Private Rafter man: â€Å"You know what really pisses me off...we’re supposed to helping them, and they shit all over us every chance they get. I just can’t feature that.† Rafterman’s remarks reflect the belief that the U.S. is really helping the Vietnamese; he is naive soldier who doesn’t understand the source of Vietnam hostility towards U.S. soldiers. The idea of America-helping-Vietnam is reiterated by a Colonel in the city of Hue: â€Å"We are here to help the Vietnamese because inside every gook there is an American trying to get out†. The Colonel portrays the U.S. intervention as a mission to liberate the Vietnamese. America is associated with freedom, and thus the image of an American climbing out of a Vietnamese represents the Vietnamese people discovering freedom. Therefore, Colonel believes the U.S. has a mission to help. While the messages of Rafterman and the Colonel support the war, the majority of characters in the film criticize the war as an unjustified bloodshed. About halfway into the movie, Private Joker and the squadron circle around the corpse of two dead comrades. Rafteran once again praises the U.S. sacrifice in the fight for democracy, but Private Animal Mother

Advertising is not bad for children’s health Free Essays

Majority of the children are still healthy – there is no clear proof that Australian children are becoming less healthy – survey of 5000 children aged 4-16 in schools across NSW, conducted by NSW government, concluded that only 5% increase of overweight population since 1997 to around 25% – children are exercising more frequently more than they were in 1997 2. Children’s good health may be attributed to food chains – Ryan, 9, plays organized sports, intelligent and has a healthy weight and eats McDonald’s burger and fries and fastfood pizza – McDonald’s encourages children to be involved in sports through sponsoring competitions 3. Advertising detractors just want to make the fastfood chains business difficult – most of them are not interested in children’s eating habits at all 4. We will write a custom essay sample on Advertising is not bad for children’s health or any similar topic only for you Order Now Advertisement for food aimed at children do not really make them eat more than they otherwise would – companies advertise not with the aim of making children eat more but of the market share 5. Advertising is the only way for producers to share information with the community about their products – it would be disservice to the company and to the community they serve – children, like consumers, need access to information to allow them to be educated C: Advertising is not bad for children’s health Evaluation: This article was written by the author in response to the imperative demand of groups lobbying for banning advertisements of fastfood chains as it harms the children’s health. These groups have claimed that the ill-health and obesity among children are caused by these advertisements and that banning these advertisements is vital to the health of the children. The author uses informal language in the counter arguments. It attempted to produce scientific claims as rebuttal. There are five major premises in this article. One scientific data was included to support the first claim and no other researches were used as evidence in the succeeding arguments. The first argument suggests that according to a survey conducted by NSW government, the children in Australia are still healthy compared to only 5% increase in the overweight population. This statement gives the impression that the rest of the 70% of the population do not suffer from overweight problems or are normal. The survey should have furthered on how many in the population are underweight because unhealthy weight of children come in both directions. Also, the article lacked information as to when the survey was conducted to compare it with the results in 1997. A more exact time frame conducted might produce a stronger comparison as to the health of the children in terms of their weight. The second support statement saying that children exercise more frequently than they were in 1997 could have been made more substantive if detailed in the survey. This might give the readers the impression that selective reading might have been done to support the claim. Variables in the survey should specify the frequency of exercise that makes the children healthier. The second premise is an argument based on example. In logic, this is a big fallacy. One can not claim to have his own experience applicable to the entire community or to a group of people. What is true to one may not be true to another. A specific example of Ryan can not suffice as evidence. Logically it is applying a conclusion out of a single example which may be illicit generalization. The statement about Ryan saying that his favorite food are from the fastfood chains do not necessarily mean that eating them would make him healthy. Making these foods as his favorite does not also mean that he eats these foods exclusively everyday. For all we know, Ryan may be taking vitamin supplements to make him healthy and maintain optimum function. Secondly, Mc Donald’s sport competitions may not necessarily mean that they are concerned about the children’s health. This article has mentioned already that the interest of the company is to produce market share, to therefore produce good profit. If McDonald’s chooses to be visible in children activities, it does not necessarily make them nutritious and healthy as a fastfood chain. Supporting events do not necessarily exempt McDonald’s from any allegation the pro-health lobbyist groups have indicted them. The third argument attacks on the main motivation of detractors. The article suggests that the qualms of these advertising antagonists is that they are mainly concerned about destroying the reputation of fastfood chains and not really caring of children’s health. The single subpremise provided by this argument can not be sufficient in supporting this argument. This argument, let alone, does not have enough bearing to stand on its own because it did not clearly illustrate the real world scenario as it has claimed. The undertone of this argument implies that there is a bigger competition in the food business against the fastfood chains. This may at least be true thinking that it eats up the market share of other cuisines in terms of children. However, the claim should have included statistics to point into figures the alleged claim of the madness among detractors. The fourth argument, saying that the aim of advertisements is not really to have the children eat more but to have a bigger market share may prove to be a realistic argument. This is the only argument that does not rely on health statistics right at the onset. It may not be obvious in the advertisement upon its theme and delivery, however, the clear picture among the businessmen running the company is to have a bigger share in the market to produce more profit. It does not have control as to how much food the children are going to eat in their foodchains, their main concern is the number of sales they get at the end of the day. Health may not be a selling ground in this argument, however, it is the only sensible and truthful among the other arguments posted in the article. The last argument saying that advertising is the only way for producers to share information to their community may not necessarily be true. The trend of having models wear a specific product for example or incorporating in movies the product of McDonald’s may not be blatantly advertising but it gives out the same information. The last argument is generalizing that the only outlet for information dissemination among companies is through paid advertisements in televisions when in fact people can always have testimonies, researches, tabloids and other media sources. The subpremise saying that it may be a form of disservice to the community if the company may not be able to advertise may partially be true. If the company has perks that are available for the community in a specified time frame, this argument may be acceptable. Otherwise, the company may exist without the benefits of advertisement. The second subpremise in this argument is that children need information, too. Just like people who are in quest for knowledge of a certain product or are just slack and waiting for information, children need adventurous or interesting ways of product presentation and information. Most likely, the creative way to producing such is through advertisements. There is greater product recall and product orientation in the way the product is presented in advertisements rather than reading it in tabloids or in journals. Advertisement seem to capture interest and in its emotional appeal rather than the rationalization in broadsheets, and the like. Like all people, children need information. As a whole, the entire article in its specificity and clarity is not persuasive enough to claim that advertising is not bad for children’s health. Perhaps, the biggest loophole in this article is the failure to provide a causal link between the two terms: advertising and children’s health. It has also failed to define the nature of advertising and the nature of children’s health, although, obesity was implied as the main illness in the argument. Objectively, right at the outset, these terms would have been defined and given background as to the qualms of the detractors to make the entire tone of the article more substantive. There must be a direct link as to advertising directly affecting a group of children, making them really unhealthy and must cause a wave of urgency to have this stopped. The article is highly opinionated and may need evidences to support its claims. A better article should contain statistics relating to specific arguments as a number of 6th grade students are reported obese after eating at mcdonald’s once a day for the entire 2 months. Further researches and surveys should be made to support claims and to make the entire article more persuasive. Claims could have been furthermore substantiated to make the article more convincing. The survey conducted by NSW would have been more convincing if it included complete information as to the date of the conduction of the survey to have a better comparison to the status of the health of children today. This should have at least mentioned as to the frequency of the subjects going to fastfood in a week or any information in that line. If complete information was released in this survey, it would have been more convincing and more substantive. This is the only survey produced in this article and the only form of science that can be investigated further to support the claim of this article. However, it still poses questions in the readers’ thoughts therefore compromising its validity and accuracy. In general, I should say that the author was not clear and satisfactory in its counter argument in his claim that Advertising is not bad for children’s health. How to cite Advertising is not bad for children’s health, Papers

Sustainable Operations Supply Management -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Sustainable Operations And Supply Chain Management? Answer: Introduction Procurement can be defined differently depending on the context. In business context procurement may refer to the process in which an organisation follows so that it can be able to buy goods or services mostly through tenders. Here is whereby an organisation gives its demands to external sources then many of the suppliers show their interest on supplying the organisation. The organisation decides on who to give the tender depending on their quality goods or services, relatively low price compared to others and their reliability. It involves preparing of demand list of goods, receipt showing goods delivered to them and finally approving payment. Sustainable procurement refers to the state where the organisation manages to operate while making profit and at the same time minimizing on the chances of causing harm to the environment. Sustainable procurement is also practiced in hospitality. Hospitality refers to treating people friendly as you serve them. You can serve them with foods or drinks. Hospitality industry is very broad though many people think that it only deals with hotels. Actually it aims at satisfying customer needs leaving them happy and allowing them enjoy their leisure time. Procurement function In hospitality industry procurement sector is very important. For example in the case of an hotel, procurement department ensures that the goods or raw materials that are required are purchased and availed in the industry in good time, good quality and will also enable making of profit (Mrnjavac et al, 2017).It also ensures that the hotel is in good condition such that the people will be satisfied at their service (Verma, 2014).It is the work of procurement sector to select the suppliers whom will serve the industry. Limitations of sustainable procurement Some of the limitations of sustainable procurement include the following; Lack top management commitment-the managers fail to organize and coordinate smooth flow of activities like ordering for quality goods on time .Others mismanage the funds to a point of not paying the workers (Hsu et al, 2014). They use industry funds for their own benefit. These causes the organisation collapse. Lack of training and information-an operations can have insufficient trained employees who can handle risks if any (Lynn, 2009). For example, if there are delays in the supply chain, no one to attend to the matter at hand. Sometimes the industry dont have enough funds to cater for the training of its workers. Difficulties with imposing changes-not all people are willing to adapt new changes if imposed in the organisation (Kannan et al, 2013).For example the society had got used to being supplied with beer but this time round the selling commodity is beef. Many who are not yet aware of the change, will come to buy beer from the pub only to find that beef is selling instead. This may bring confusion amongst the community members thus decline in their productivity. Additional costs-when an organisation has already budgeted and started implementation then unplanned task arises it forces them to use more funds which were not planned (Homburg et al, 2013).for example the incoming beef industry has to incur cost in advertising to make people aware that it is no longer a pub but beef industry. They also have to buy some storage equipment like refrigerator for beef is perishable. Corporate social responsibility Corporate social responsibility refers to how an organisation carries on its activities ensuring that economic, social and environmental aspects are taken care of as the shareholders and stake-holders expectations are met. For the smooth running of the beef business, the environment around the business must be conducive, and should favor the operation of the business (Mwangi et al, 2013). The business should meet the demands of the people in that particular environment, and should also be conducive enough to accommodate the survival of potential buyers and sellers, who will plough back profit into the organization. The economy of the country is determined by the ability of companies and organizations of the country or state to meet the demands of the people (Belvedereet al, 2017). When everybody is satisfied, then it becomes easy for the country to have a stable economy, thus easy to support the people in the grassroots. The beef business should also ensure that the stakeholders are respected thus paid at the appropriate time. Promotions should be granted to the qualified stuff, thus discouraging corruption, which may draw the organization back in terms of development. Supply chain management Supply chain is the processes involved in the movement of raw materials from the source to the organisation, for them to be turned into finished goods. It also involves movement of financial goods from the producer to the market or consumer. For this flow of chain to be smooth, some aspects should be considered. First, the supplier of raw materials should provide quality materials-this is to enable quality finished goods so that the consumer can be satisfied and buy more and more. In return the supplier should be paid on time without delays and under the agreed terms, if full payment on delivery or installments (Earls, 2013). This motivates them to supply for a longer period. For the case of beef industry, their raw material is beef cattle. This beef cattle can be found in ranches or individual people bring them to the market place. They then purchase them and take them to slaughter houses and later have meat for sale. The beef industry has to ensure that it has reliable supply of th e meat to avoid shortage or delays when customers are in demand. They should also make payments to the supplier as agreed during the contract to avoid discouraging and demotivating them. The organisation should have improved means of communication so that they can keep in touch with the supplier to stay updated and also communicate to consumers and receive feedback (Pavia, 2007). They have to enquire from the consumers whether the meat is of good quality and if any had any side effects concerning it. Secondly, the organisation should ensure that the finished goods that reach the customer are of standard quality and no fake ones that are released to confuse them. As the manufacturers continue to produce more products, they should ensure that there is no overflow of similar commodities in the market. If so the demand would be low hence low sales or find a way of eliminating their competitor. For example selling their meat at relatively lower prices. Supplier selection For an organisation to run, there must be a reliable source of raw materials. Different organizations use different criteria of choosing their suppliers. Some of them advertise the vacancies for suppliers to apply (Rimmington et al, 2006). They then contact those who qualify for interview. Mostly enquire for samples and their pricing. Here they check the best quality and fair pricing. They then determine the supplier of their choice. They get into contract on the terms of supplying and payment too. In the case of beef industry they can decide to choose some of its workers to be going to the market at particular days or if there is need, to purchase the beef cattle on their own. Others may decide to have a particular supplier who will be bringing them to the industry on agreed terms. Social, environment and economic implications of procurement (The Triple Bottom Line-TBL) Social environment in an organization is the association of workers, and their managerial staff. However, the suppliers should also be social with the potential consumers to facilitate health business. The consumers should be taken care of thus all their demands should be met since they are the target of a business (Lemos et al, 2002). The business should therefore be healthy enough to give back to the society, thus enabling the society to benefit from the existence of the same organization. The triple bottom line acts in a way that the organization reaches a point whereby it can give back to the society. At this stage, it simply means that the organization has grown, and is therefore contributing much to the economy of the country (Perkowsky, 2016). It is therefore possible for the organization to offer job opportunities to the jobless in the society, thus terminating the logic of joblessness in the country or state. On the side of environmental implications, the industry should ens ure that as much as they benefit they should not pollute the environment. First, they should have proper disposal of their waste. They should not dispose their garbage anywhere and anyhow because they liter the surrounding and also cause air pollution. Both workers and consumers find it hard to work in unconducive environment and bad smell (In Nedelea et al, 2016). Secondly they should treat their waste before disposing because if not it can lead to water pollution. When the water is polluted can also lead to waterborne diseases. In a way it affects the economy for one has to use their salaries in seeking medication instead of improving their living standards. The beef industry will require workers so the people around shall get employment. It should practice proper disposal of its waste so that it dont pollute the environment.it will have reduced noise pollution as compared to the pub, because most pubs have discos. References Rimmington, M., Carlton Smith, J., Hawkins, R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and sustainable food procurement.British Food Journal,108(10), 824-837. doi: 10.1108/00070700610702082 Lemos, A. D. D. C., Giacomucci, A. (2002). Green procurement activities: some environmental indicators and practical actions taken by industry and tourism.International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development,1(1), 59-72. doi: 10.1504/IJESD.2002.000718 Earls, E. (2013). Shop for a greener deal.Caterer Hotelkeeper,203(4799), 32-34. Pavia, N., Ivanovic, S. (2007). The Procurement process in the hotel industry.Tourism Hospitality Management,13(3), 637-642. Perkowsky, A. (2016). Cutting procurement costs will help bottom line.Hotel Business,25(9), 58. Mwangi, T. D., Kariuki, T. J. (2013). Factors affecting compliance of public hospitality entities to public procurement laws and regulations in Kenya.International Journal of Business and Commerce,2(10), 66-78. Verma, A. S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices: Selective case studies from indian hospitality industry.International Management Review,10(2), 13. Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Shyu, G. S., Chen, P. S. (2014). Low carbon supplier selection in the hotel industry.Sustainability,6(5), 2658-2684. Mrnjavac, E., Pavia, N., Cerovi?, M. (2017).Procurement in the supply chain : an element of hotel product competitiveness. Lynn, C. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the hospitality industry.Hosteur,18(2), 5-10. Arlene Garrick, C. H. E., CHRP, C. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Hospitality Industry. Kannan,G., Roohollah,K., Ahmad,J. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345354. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014. Homburg, C., Stierl, M., Bornemann, T. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in business-to-business markets: how organizational customers account for supplier Corporate social responsibility engagement.Journal of Marketing,77(6), 54-72. In Nedelea, A., In Korstanje, M., In George, B. P. (2016). Strategic tools and methods for promoting hospitality and tourism services. Belvedere, V., Grando, A. (2017). Sustainable operations and supply chain management.